Only if my spouse cheated.

Have never in my life cheated on a partner. Ever. My attitude has always been that if it's broke, I'm gone before that happens.

Never, why be together ? If you cheat then you might as well leave, the same goes for the significant other. Trust has been broken.

no,it's one of the top 10 on the hit parade.
don't comit adulttre.

If you are in a relationship, you should never cheat under any circumstance. It is so much easier to just break up before hand. Why cheat

the whole 3 minutes would hardly be worth a lifetime of regret

She is mine and I am hers. To cheat would break the love that brought us together. I have been married more than 38 years. She is the only

Sure if the woman cheats, then it gives a green light for the husband to do the same. If she does not like it , tough.

I would cheat on my S.O. because of his infidelity, emotional neglect and/or emotional or physical abuse.

Absolutely not and anyone who would is disgusting.

No, I love her she is my life mate,knew it and was married 8-months later.5 1/2 years and we are still in honeymoon mode,will be forever

Monogamy is over-rated. Cheating is a function of convenience and quality of opportunities. With those 2 in place, everyone will cheat.

If he was smart, there would be a disclaimer if she is using the network.

she uses ny email assress so what is the problem

I would definitely would if we jointly owned the computer and we both paid the bill on the email account. It would be my right as co-payor

If i truly felt the need was there, I would do so

A computer in his own home? Password given by his wife and written down? She wanted to get caught. No crime here.

It is a simple matter of respect - just as I would not open a package or letter addressed to my spouse (only).

Whoever gets on email first checks what comes in in case something is important. It's not snooping, it's working together as partners.

My husband and i share an account so i dont think its snooping. What happened to whats mine is yours and yours is mine.

Only a life lived with transparency is worth sharing. Because I've been cheated on previously, I wouldn't consider a marriage w/ secrets.

Anything on a web server and sent over the internet is open information. How do you think corporations get e-evidence?

My wife and I respect each other's privacy; still, we use a single email account and assume the other will read our individual emails.

If you think your partner keeps no secrets from you... guess again! Don't give up your autonomy as a person because of the ring on your han

She had her passwords right next to the computer - a shared computer. No secrets! Same with kids (especially!!)

This is an asinine case. Married people have no secrets from each other. Unless the jury are fools, all will be ok.

Snooped is not the right word, however I have a right to know what is going on in your life if I am your husband and you won't share.

I believe there s/b trust between partners. If partners share password, one should only reads email in presence of the other.

No, but if I suspected I might be tempted to protect against disease I'd see a MD also.

If you have nothing to hide, why would you care?

My husband is computer illiterate. He used to have an account that I would have to check - now I have one that we basically share.

I think if you feel the need to check your partner's e-mail to see if he/she is cheating then the relationship is already over.

If I didn't trust my husband I wouldn't be married to him. Enough said.

She should have hidden her passwords if she didn't want him in them. They are set for just that reason.

My ex hacked into my email & bank account & printed emails about my personal, medical, and financial information, then gave them to family.

we open mail, email ...whatever at our house

While half of marriages end in divorce, half of the divorcees probably did not want it to end. Do not glorify your wants, it' tacky.

How hard would have been for either to say 'this is not a good thing'?

Two innocent people (the exes) were hurt. By running this story, the Times has certainly added insult to injury. This was not fit to prin

The absolute betrayel by these 2 people is so shocking. To wreck 2 marriages, and cause instability for the children is such a selfish act

There was no infidelity, they seperated before pursuing anything.

I don't care that the paper ran the story, but I do feel bad for the victims of these two people's selfishness, namely, the kids.

Isn't there a point to making vows? Or do they just count until something better comes along?

They didn't go out on couples dates. They dated each other right in front of their own spouses. Tacky and thoroughly selfish.

Life is too short to not be happy. Bravo for this couple. Things always happen for a reason. For the Ex's, time heals all wounds. I know.

It's not "infidelity". They say they didn't have an affair - they split with their spouses before getting together.

With the divorce rate nearing 60% it is a natural part of our society. People meet and people fall in love when they are missing something.

It's just a column. However, I would love to see the other spouses and kids take on the story there too. That would have been fair.

I guess the meaning of commitment has changed. As for "Vows", how can they make a vow to each other, since they broke vows to be together?

The NY Times, "all the news that $h1t to print".

Don't agree- but they:re honest and didn't have a sordid affair.The AP says 22% of married men & 14% married women have at least one affai

I think it is no different than the tons of celebs that do this and people still idolize them and dont judge them .

Just one more example of throw away marriages. For better or worse means working out problems together. Uphold marriage vows!

I'm more appalled at the attention-whoring couple than the NYT. No one cares that you're both horrible people. Just die already.

I am tired of other people judging people

"Til death do us part" was the vow they made, NOT "til I find someone I like better!" Nothing more than pure selfishness with no morals.

According to the story, there wasn't physical infidelity. They wanted to be together and split with their spouses first.

Who cares? You think this doesn't happen every day of the week in middle America?

don't worry, both of them will meet someone else, and the times can put then new couple on a pedistle.

Plenty of very happy marriages started just this way. It is very good positive reinforcement for people to see others doing this also.

I THINK THE NATION NEEDS TO KEEP THEIR NOSE OUT OF TIGER'S PERSONAL AFFAIRS; AND THAT GOES FOR MATT AND MEREDITH. LEAVE THE GUY ALONE!!!

Easier said than done, but less heartache in the long run for her & her children. Tiger clearly cannot sustain a monogamous relationship.

Maybe he should check out what she is doing too.

This discussion is pathological. This couple needs help and has asked for privacy. Give it to them. Stop acting like circling vultures.

forgive him for once, but a 3-year relationship with another woman... Oh NO

This is such a private matter, why should we be in the mix at all!!! They have a tough road ahead, God Bless them !!

i am shocked and saddened that the today show would entertain such a poll. The Today Show should be ashamed of themselves.

It depends on if she loves him and what behaviors he is willing to change to save his marriage i.e she gets full access to cell phone/e-mai

If he gives her all passwords, GPS on his car, etc. and call the otehr women to end once and for all, she should try to work it out

NO, but my husband is not a famous athlete worth millions. I'm sure women thow themselves at him all the time, after a while, he got weak.

I am so sick of women who 'stand by their man'. Dump his ass and live your life. Women everywhere will stand up & cheer!

She needs to handle it in the way that is best for her and the children.

Is this really something that is anyone's business other than the people involved?

She should give him 1 chance. If he ever screws up again, she should take all the money and the kids and go back to Sweden

Most of the "I don't know" responders are right. None of us can say either way but for the kids' sake they need to figure it out in private

Money doesn't buy happiness. But if he can change she could give him another chance before leaving. After all they do have children.

Give them a break and leave alone long enought so they can figure it out. She is going thru heck right now and the last thing she needs is

If there's another 55 million coming in two years I think sticking it out until then should be the way she should go...the kids need a dad

If there's a pre-nup she could leave empty handed. She should stay long enough to get as much as she can and then leave.

Take the money and run. Life's too short to live in the spotlight like this

Once a cheater always a cheater. Her sanity and health are at risk with Tiger's reckless behavior.

absolutely not! do not leave...stick with it and make this marriage/family work! too many just jump into the divorce lawyers eager hands .

Mistakes are made by young people who quickly move into fame and fortune. It's worth giving it a chance. You can always leave.

Men want the money for the sex.. women give the sex for the money. taking the money shows it wasn't the love of the marriage just the money

This is one of our many problems as a society. Men who will not uphold the moral commitments we have made. And others being ok with it!

I'll NEVER understand why some men bother to marry, for many men become BORED with being w/one woman!

If he can cheat on his wife then what makes you think when he gets with you that he won't cheat on you. There are single good guys out ther

Having been cheated on by the only 2 serious partners I've ever had, I'd say it's ALWAYS wrong. It's dishonest and that will never be right

If the divorce is not finalized, he is not a free man. It's just simple, he is still tied to another woman and it's hands off.

For me the answer is no. Marriage is a one on one commitment. Don't enter into the marriage if you can't honor it.

It is completely and morally wrong to date a married man, if he is not happy he should get a divorce and then date.

I believe it's wrong even if the marriage is unstable. The only time I can see it not cheating is if it's a verified open marriage.

Of course not, it's wrong and immoral; most of the time they're lying when they claim they will leave their wife for you, ask for the proof

people blame Bill Clinton, but Lewinsky knew without a doubt that he was married and that does not make her a victim. she knew it was WRON

No to N.O.!!!! Any woman dating a married man is delusional. Any married man is just cheating on EVERYONE including himself!

Your selfishness is disgusting to me. A married man is not an option and until little girls like you stop engaging them, cheating won't sto

Absolutely NEVER is it ok. You know he's married? He's off limits, regardless of whether or not he's willing.

I find it insulting to be asked out by a married man. I am not trash and shouldn't be treated that way.

If they are still living at home, no. If they have moved out and are in the process of divorce, maybe as long as the wife is aware.

There's no way to rationalize it. It's not OK to date a married man. People will be hurt.

This girl is making excuses for her behavior, ESPECIALLY being in 'her' bed! If she was HIS soul-mate, he'd leave his wife to be with her.

If you are using him for sex like he is using you, then hump away. But only a fool "dates" a married man. He will not leave his wife.

Go on and do it if you want to feel like a robber. You have to sit silently on the side when he speaks to his wife on the phone!

I did not know I would have ever dated a married man, but it's sad to say am 33 and have been dating one for the past 8 years.

A leopard will never change his spots& if he is dishonest with her how can you ever think about trusting him? A man will say it's over..NOT

Isn't committment one of the things that separates us from the animals?

I am the wife trying to survive the revelation of an affair my husband had with a girl 30 years younger. The price is painful for everyone

Often times little is romantic about daily issues. Deal with those before you distract yourself with an affair.

It seems that the media has hooked on to this new 'bone', so invest the money for the kids' futures, and try to repair the mess created.

No one has a picture perfect childhood. The kids will be fine.

The best gift you can give your children is two happily married parents. Make it work.

These children deserve the privacy which their parents have sold. There need to be federal laws that protect ALL children from reality TV.

You don't exploit your kids to make millions and that's whay they've done! Time to think of them and not a wallet!

The cameras do not follow their 'every move' - they are only filmed a few hours a week on a couple of days...Get over it people

This show has become extreemly disturbing and it is obvious that the kids do not like the cameras pushed into their faces.

Great people have grown up fine from worse environments than this. How they choose to use their life experience later will be up to them.

reality or another gimmic to boost ratings? Grow up Jon, go back to work. Kate stop the appearances.Get family counselling&enjoy the kids

it's getting to the point where it just needs to end. For the kids sake and their marriage.

They're too old to have their every move watched; they won't know "normal". Plus, home is too dysfunctional.

The breakup of their family is a nightmare for these children. No good can come of having this painful chapter of their lives recorded.

Who says reality tv isn't normal?

Cancel it! The poor kids can't sleep or pee without the world knowing it!