Disappointed Johnny Depp got involoved with this...I thought he was a good guy. I would expect him to do this for kids who needed help...not these privileged few...not my favorite anymore..it's all about money.
My impression is that this party with Mr. Depp was for the privilged few and did not include the children of military personel (check your spelling) or local school children. Every president has the right to use his home as he sees fit and I have no problem with that. It is, for me, a loss of esteem for Mr. Depp, who usually stays out of things like this....and why was it kept so quiet?
Just another "extremely" controversial item dealing with this family since EVERYTHING this family does in the East or West Wing is "extremely" controversial.
I wonder if the book (which I will not read) has information on WHY Mrs. Obama made comments in New Hampshire on a campaign jaunt for her husband that Mr. Obama's mother was discriminated against by the bank in Hawaii, even though Obama's mother was the FIRST woman appointed to a high ranking position within the bank.
The party was after they passed out some candy and token gratitude's to the military and needy families. They were not partying with the elite in the other room.
Our (has he himself would say) lazy President, wife and kiddies are unfortunately just some elitists people occupying the grand and glorious White House of ours, the taxpayers. Well, they'll be moving out next January. Hope inventory has been taken!
While I have opposed many of the President's policies and am nowhere close to he or the First Lady in my political beliefs, I have no issue with how they have conducted themselves while he has been in public office.
I will continue to oppose many of his policies and beliefs and will keep all options open for who I vote for President this year, but I will also not crawl in the gutter and get into rumors, private matters (even those in public office are entitled to some personal privacy) or garbage like the whole birther deal.
Douchebag authors love articles like this and to sell their misinformed books, whether it be about Bush, Obama, or anyone else. But its good to get angry over a bunch of fiction, when someone lies to you and tells you its fact...
Maybe you should try reading comprehension and re-read the part where he clearly states the party was not for elites and encouraged readers to go and get the real facts about the party..FACTS SOMETHING REDUMBICANS DON"T LIKE!!!!..
"In lesser hands 'The Obamas' would be an act of astonishing overreach, but Ms. Kantor ... has earned the voice of authority," Schultz writes. "A meticulous reporter, Ms. Kantor is attuned to the nuance of small gestures, the import of unspoken truths."
Ms Kantor should watch out: mind-readers, even those who have "earned the voice of authority," sometimes suffer the ducking-stool. My intuition and reading of the nuance of the small gesture of her having written this book, imports the unspoken truth of a cheap shot at the gravy train of sensationalist journalism. But I defer to greater minds such as those of Ms. Schultz (even though she might have had to hold her nose while conferring the imprimatur on Kantor's 'Journalism').
Hey if Obama did it and helped him enrich himself by having books ghost written and published while he is president, why can't others get on the gravy train?
Everyone knows Mrs. Obama is no Mamie Eisenhower or Mrs. George Bush Sr.
If she is going to publicly contradict her husband on details of his birth, she is fair game!
President Obama DID not write any books since he has been in office. Both books were written by HIM (unlike Sarah Palin who actually HAD to use ghost writers) before he was elected (his last book was written when he was a senator). Both books were purchased by me in 2008 when he RAN for president. I have no problem believing that a Harvard graduate (with honors) and president of Harvard Law Review (which Obama was) is intelligent enough to write a book. You need to do your homework instead of spattering your nonsense here. Another thing, give the birth thing a rest - only diehard uninformed people are hanging onto that one!
Of course Michelle is not Mamie or Barbara Bush - why would she be? She's half Barbara's age and thank goodness Michelle is no Mamie Eisenhower - that woman is dead!
Always room for racism, hey, Danny-boy? Did you do the clumsy photo retouching yourself? Your local community college offers PhotoShop courses...if you can get accepted, and then not get expelled for your blatant racism. On second thought, never mind...it's possible the instructor might be one of them there "free men or women".
Dan, you show just how low a citizen can go to show disrespect to the OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. To deface the image of any president shows utter contempt for our great country.
Hey Dan - Is the Bushey for real or just something you think you will be admired for? I've no idea what's true and what isn't. I strongly suspect a combination of the two. Don't really care much. I have noticed that people who use all caps a lot tend to be somewhat intellectually challenged. I'm sure that's not the case with you. Your inspirational artwork and ability to express yourself so well indicates a keen mind.
Dan, you show just how low a citizen can go to show disrespect to the OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. To deface the image of any president shows utter contempt for our great country.
You've got to be kidding! Like those of us on the right didn't listen to crap for 8 years while Bush was in office. This is the way it works, and you know it; whoever is in office, gets blasted from those on the other side. It always has and always will work both ways! Just like what we will be again listening to for the 8 years beginning January, 2013. But we can take it - at least we will get the United States of America back!!
And the contempt for our country has been clearly demostrated for the last three years by this obamanation. Our contempt is directly towards the man himself. We are striving to save "our" country.
To deface the image of any president is as if one painted a swastika over the stars and stripes. We have a right and a privilege to express our views but should never disrespect the nation that gives us that right.
You know, after seeing your disgusting avatar...and no, I didn't like Bush but I didn't draw him with some kind of racial nastiness on him...I really wouldn't expect anything but what you wrote. Of course some would agree...what would you expect? If you read comments on here some people believe all kinds of things...doesn't matter if they're true or not...lol.
Well, at first I was a little shocked to see your comment... but then I saw you GLARINGLY RACIST photo and realized you were just another ignoramous. Please save the public the exhaustion of putting you in your place and educate yourself. Thanks.
Who knows how much of the book is really the whole truth. We all have our opinions on this. I personally believe most of it. Mrs obama claims to be a very sweet person, and she loves everybody. I personally go by the old saying; ME THINKS THE LADY DOTH PROTEST TO MUCH! Photos have been taken and posted of her, and anyone looking at her facial expression, can see the pure hatred that can come from her. I do not for one minute believe her to be a very sweet and sincere lady.
As for trying to hide the gala from the news, and tone it down for fear of people thinking it was too exspensive. This I do not believe so much. If the obamas have proven anything to us, it is that they have no morals as far as it goes, on spending tax payers money. Trips all over the world, and takes entire family almost every time. Hawaii, last vacation,$ 4,500.000.00!! WOW!! No president can match the amount of money they have spent of tax payers money. So, no, I don't really believe author on this point. It's up to the rest of you to make your own opinions. Good luck.
I would not go so far to say hatred, but she often does have a look of annoyance except when she is with children, but then they would not be challenging her which I think is the issue.
Look the Obamas have never liked the direction the US has been going. So they have their own dream of how the US should become and they are working very hard to change it while they have control. So naturally anybody that is in their way will get mowed over and they do not hesitate to let others do their persuading.
I judge the standards of people by those they choose to hang around with or those they put in charge. So this would be their choice and that is what I measure. When Obama put Debbie in charge after Weiner gave up his attack position, that pretty much did it for me. It isn't that she is so aggressive, but she is nasty. Weiner was nasty as well. Who would want them as their spokesperson for their party. I would think bridging and not dividing would be a priority for the president. It is not.
"Photos have been taken and posted of her, and anyone looking at her facial expression, can see the pure hatred that can come from her."
It is obvious that Mr. Obama sets the standard for facial expressions within the family. Ever notice HIS facial expressions in almost every picture. Sorta looks like a dictator.
How can someone agree with"most of it" when it hasn't even been released?
Could it be that you have a bias? Next time don't reveal your true biased feelings in the rest of the post and people might treat your opinion with some respect.
@ Veteran44 I don't ever recall Mrs. Obama saying that she was a very sweet person and loves everyone. You can believe what ever you want because really "Nobody Cares"
What's this Country coming to when "The Great Leader" is doubted? There where dozens of books dumping on Bush, his Wife, his Dog, his State, his Religion, his Father,and his Daughters were Sluts too. It's about time someone did the same to Barack Husein Obama,mmm,mmm,mmm!
Gosh. Don't you just hate it when someone else decides to characterize your activities? Perhaps folks in the White House ought to call the Bush's............
Im wondering why a correspondent of the NYT would be writing a hit job on the President of the United States. Seems to me, she loses her authority and objectivity no matter how meticulous she may be!
This is certainly one of those things taht make you go HHHHHHMMMMMMMM..............
Hey Jodi, where's that meticulously researched article on how the GOP deliberately created this debt crisis so they could privatize SS and Medicare?? You know.. "starve the beast"!!
Tom those books have been by the thousands for 3 years. They blame all worlds wrongs on Bush. That is the Obama's "M.O." point a finger somewhere else.
She simply wants to make a lot of money. Can't do that if it isn't controversial. Create a stir and you get interviewed on TV, you sell a lot of books.
Lets see if she's doing it at as a personal service to the country that needs to know these things. I challenge her to donate any profits from book sales or appearances to charity. I real journalist doesn't care about getting rich, just getting the facts out.
Listen to her interview on the today show. Who says "According to my reporting"? That's like saying, "I didn't say it was true, but it is what I said." She hadn't had access for over two years and even admits that her book is her interpretation of second hand rumors she heard from other people.
Is there some shred of truth to her book? Maybe, but at best it is hearsay spun into something she can sell. That isn't journalism, that's just blogging on paper for profit.
Jack What planet have you been on? The Obama,s have gotten a free ride with the so called journalists since he started running. That is why he is in the White House. The push for the second term has started havne you read the news.
I am a NY Times journalist, I know what your thinking because I have the ability to interpert your slightest gesture, expression and read your mind! Really? Wow, hire that woman.
Takenaka san, are you saying you are a mind reader like Michael ? Or are you saying he's fibbing about his job ? Or did he just forget the sarcasm font ? :) Have you had a chance to read the book yet ?
P.S. None of my comments to you are ever "personal". Ok.
I would give this book 75% truth and 25% not. It's always been puzzling how they have kept Michelle in the WH vegetable garden. She's educated and farming is not her. I believe the WH advisors have kept Michelle in the garden and behind "Obama" ... strong move on their part.
Oh please . You meant politicians not just republicans . I cant tell a dem. from a repub. anymore. They all stretch the truth for they`re own agenda. Just like this reporter.
This independent voter will give the president 4 more years to clean up after the 8 years mess Bush left. Is it just me, or does history show that democratic presidents usually clean up after the republicans leave a mess??
Its just you... because history doesn't show that. Who was it that de-regulated Wall Street. I'll make it multiple choice for you.
Ronald Reagan? Nope .. he de-regulated the Savings and Loans and we saw how that worked!
Was it Bush 41? Nope he bailed out the S&Ls.
Was it Bush 43? Nope he bailed out the banks. Warned that Fannie and Freddie should be repealed but the Democrats just laughed.
Was it Bill Clinton? Well he did repeal Glass Stegall which was in place since FDR. He did sign Graham-Leahy act and championed it as a bi-partisan effort (which made CDOs and commodities as unregulated. Of course he also signed NAFTA and gave China MFN status but I am certain those made life better for American workers too.
So whose mess was it?
aaaaaatttttt. Sorry. No points for you and you don't advance to the next round. Thanks for playing but you are not Smarter Than a Fifth Grader.
It's just you, Joe. Why risk your independence by wasting your vote on the janitor, then ? It will be a huge undertakertaking to clean up the mess from this White House posse as it is. Time to bring in a new cleanup crew. Why continue to let it get worse ? ABO 2012 :)
Nope, you're right. Let the republicans in for awhile, and then we have to hire an adult to clean up after the party. Republicans are like teenagers when the parents aren't home; anything goes, bras end up in the light fixtures, people crap in the sink, vomit in every corner. Then mom and dad clean it all up, cussing the whole time.
As for this book, there is no shortage of bottom feeders waiting to make a fast buck off of tabloid news, as Rupert Murdoch has proven.
I doubt life in the White House is all cheer and happiness, but it isn't around my place either, and we aren't trying to fix 8 years of wonton destruction.
Really? What did Carter clean up? As far as messes left behind, Osama could have been nipped in the bud by more aggressive prosecution by the Clinton administration.
Oops. I gave you the wrong answer, sorry. She's a journalist. Her political affiliation is probably dependent on which way the wind is blowing to get her material.
The question is how lavish was the Halloween Event. The President and the First Lady should hold nice events. I just hope Johnny Depp did this without any compensation, and if he did get paid, I hope he donated it to some worthwhile cause.
This First Lady did NOT write the book. A reporter did. Give ME a break - perhaps you should read the article before you start indiscriminately bashing the First Lady.
Also, FYI, some First Ladies have written books - at least one of them was named Bush.
The book is not "news." It is the evidence of a snake crawling from behind a bush. The snake is now in plain sight for those that are unbiased enough to see it. Some will think it is just a fancy belt laying upon the ground and will wear it. I do not need to read the book. It is gossip. And, what does our spiritual training tell us about gossip? My life encounters enough negativity without my going out and seeking it for the sake of sensationalism.
Disappointed Johnny Depp got involoved with this...I thought he was a good guy. I would expect him to do this for kids who needed help...not these privileged few...not my favorite anymore..it's all about money.
Really? You mean that Johnny Depp shouldn't be involved with a Halloween affair involving local school kids and the kids of military personell?
My impression is that this party with Mr. Depp was for the privilged few and did not include the children of military personel (check your spelling) or local school children. Every president has the right to use his home as he sees fit and I have no problem with that. It is, for me, a loss of esteem for Mr. Depp, who usually stays out of things like this....and why was it kept so quiet?
Hohum......
Just another "extremely" controversial item dealing with this family since EVERYTHING this family does in the East or West Wing is "extremely" controversial.
I wonder if the book (which I will not read) has information on WHY Mrs. Obama made comments in New Hampshire on a campaign jaunt for her husband that Mr. Obama's mother was discriminated against by the bank in Hawaii, even though Obama's mother was the FIRST woman appointed to a high ranking position within the bank.
NAH, probably no comments.
Yeah, especially when it is really 'personnel.'
How DARE he entertain military families!
The party was after they passed out some candy and token gratitude's to the military and needy families. They were not partying with the elite in the other room.
Our (has he himself would say) lazy President, wife and kiddies are unfortunately just some elitists people occupying the grand and glorious White House of ours, the taxpayers. Well, they'll be moving out next January. Hope inventory has been taken!
So what did Odumbo dress up as at the lavish holloween party, a clown?
I expect we'll be seeing the film adaptation on the Reelz channel shortly.
They forgot to mention, the book is to be renamed.
Yet another do-nothing American who can only talk about the greatness of others. A paparazzi indeed is just another fart on the wind.
While I have opposed many of the President's policies and am nowhere close to he or the First Lady in my political beliefs, I have no issue with how they have conducted themselves while he has been in public office.
I will continue to oppose many of his policies and beliefs and will keep all options open for who I vote for President this year, but I will also not crawl in the gutter and get into rumors, private matters (even those in public office are entitled to some personal privacy) or garbage like the whole birther deal.
Douchebag authors love articles like this and to sell their misinformed books, whether it be about Bush, Obama, or anyone else. But its good to get angry over a bunch of fiction, when someone lies to you and tells you its fact...
Does she remind you of another Author, who is Blond, and whose party has "better Blacks"? Sheesh! :-(
<Nod of respect for xrayspex>
Maybe you should try reading comprehension and re-read the part where he clearly states the party was not for elites and encouraged readers to go and get the real facts about the party..FACTS SOMETHING REDUMBICANS DON"T LIKE!!!!..
We are so lucky to live in the age of Obama. Truly one of the best Presidents ever. Ever!
What is your point, Dancnman?
Brainwashed?
Or...just plain stupid.
Oh my, look at the conservatives, collapsing comments, and calling names. Classy.
Oh ,Fred you evil dude, they are just learning this behavior from Fusty and her posse. Please give us your review of the book in question. Ta :)
"In lesser hands 'The Obamas' would be an act of astonishing overreach, but Ms. Kantor ... has earned the voice of authority," Schultz writes. "A meticulous reporter, Ms. Kantor is attuned to the nuance of small gestures, the import of unspoken truths."
Ms Kantor should watch out: mind-readers, even those who have "earned the voice of authority," sometimes suffer the ducking-stool. My intuition and reading of the nuance of the small gesture of her having written this book, imports the unspoken truth of a cheap shot at the gravy train of sensationalist journalism. But I defer to greater minds such as those of Ms. Schultz (even though she might have had to hold her nose while conferring the imprimatur on Kantor's 'Journalism').
A laugh a minute, if it weren't so pathetic.
Hey if Obama did it and helped him enrich himself by having books ghost written and published while he is president, why can't others get on the gravy train?
Everyone knows Mrs. Obama is no Mamie Eisenhower or Mrs. George Bush Sr.
If she is going to publicly contradict her husband on details of his birth, she is fair game!
President Obama DID not write any books since he has been in office. Both books were written by HIM (unlike Sarah Palin who actually HAD to use ghost writers) before he was elected (his last book was written when he was a senator). Both books were purchased by me in 2008 when he RAN for president. I have no problem believing that a Harvard graduate (with honors) and president of Harvard Law Review (which Obama was) is intelligent enough to write a book. You need to do your homework instead of spattering your nonsense here. Another thing, give the birth thing a rest - only diehard uninformed people are hanging onto that one!
Of course Michelle is not Mamie or Barbara Bush - why would she be? She's half Barbara's age and thank goodness Michelle is no Mamie Eisenhower - that woman is dead!
I appreciate her writting the book, and NOTHING in her book will suprise me!!!! I have NO DOUBT, that EVERYTHING she put in her book is......TRUE!!
Signed: Daniel L. Bushey
You've got to be kidding.
I hope you're joking...if not...I know a couple a hundred politicians with waders that the keep handy for sheeple like you
Notice approval marks for the above three comments....the majority thinks the comments in the book were TRUE.
Always room for racism, hey, Danny-boy? Did you do the clumsy photo retouching yourself? Your local community college offers PhotoShop courses...if you can get accepted, and then not get expelled for your blatant racism. On second thought, never mind...it's possible the instructor might be one of them there "free men or women".
Ooooh, here we go with the "racist" remarks from the Left. How utterly delightful.
And how, exactly, would you describe the photo Mr. Dan is posting? Neither left nor right...dead center rascist.
Dan, you show just how low a citizen can go to show disrespect to the OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. To deface the image of any president shows utter contempt for our great country.
Hey Dan - Is the Bushey for real or just something you think you will be admired for? I've no idea what's true and what isn't. I strongly suspect a combination of the two. Don't really care much. I have noticed that people who use all caps a lot tend to be somewhat intellectually challenged. I'm sure that's not the case with you. Your inspirational artwork and ability to express yourself so well indicates a keen mind.
Sarcasm. OK, s-a-r-c-a-s-m.
Irish-n-green said:
You've got to be kidding! Like those of us on the right didn't listen to crap for 8 years while Bush was in office. This is the way it works, and you know it; whoever is in office, gets blasted from those on the other side. It always has and always will work both ways! Just like what we will be again listening to for the 8 years beginning January, 2013. But we can take it - at least we will get the United States of America back!!
And the contempt for our country has been clearly demostrated for the last three years by this obamanation. Our contempt is directly towards the man himself. We are striving to save "our" country.
Hopeful,
To deface the image of any president is as if one painted a swastika over the stars and stripes. We have a right and a privilege to express our views but should never disrespect the nation that gives us that right.
You know, after seeing your disgusting avatar...and no, I didn't like Bush but I didn't draw him with some kind of racial nastiness on him...I really wouldn't expect anything but what you wrote. Of course some would agree...what would you expect? If you read comments on here some people believe all kinds of things...doesn't matter if they're true or not...lol.
Well, at first I was a little shocked to see your comment... but then I saw you GLARINGLY RACIST photo and realized you were just another ignoramous. Please save the public the exhaustion of putting you in your place and educate yourself. Thanks.
Who knows how much of the book is really the whole truth. We all have our opinions on this. I personally believe most of it. Mrs obama claims to be a very sweet person, and she loves everybody. I personally go by the old saying; ME THINKS THE LADY DOTH PROTEST TO MUCH! Photos have been taken and posted of her, and anyone looking at her facial expression, can see the pure hatred that can come from her. I do not for one minute believe her to be a very sweet and sincere lady.
As for trying to hide the gala from the news, and tone it down for fear of people thinking it was too exspensive. This I do not believe so much. If the obamas have proven anything to us, it is that they have no morals as far as it goes, on spending tax payers money. Trips all over the world, and takes entire family almost every time. Hawaii, last vacation,$ 4,500.000.00!! WOW!! No president can match the amount of money they have spent of tax payers money. So, no, I don't really believe author on this point. It's up to the rest of you to make your own opinions. Good luck.
I would not go so far to say hatred, but she often does have a look of annoyance except when she is with children, but then they would not be challenging her which I think is the issue.
Look the Obamas have never liked the direction the US has been going. So they have their own dream of how the US should become and they are working very hard to change it while they have control. So naturally anybody that is in their way will get mowed over and they do not hesitate to let others do their persuading.
I judge the standards of people by those they choose to hang around with or those they put in charge. So this would be their choice and that is what I measure. When Obama put Debbie in charge after Weiner gave up his attack position, that pretty much did it for me. It isn't that she is so aggressive, but she is nasty. Weiner was nasty as well. Who would want them as their spokesperson for their party. I would think bridging and not dividing would be a priority for the president. It is not.
"Photos have been taken and posted of her, and anyone looking at her facial expression, can see the pure hatred that can come from her."
It is obvious that Mr. Obama sets the standard for facial expressions within the family. Ever notice HIS facial expressions in almost every picture. Sorta looks like a dictator.
How can someone agree with"most of it" when it hasn't even been released?
Could it be that you have a bias? Next time don't reveal your true biased feelings in the rest of the post and people might treat your opinion with some respect.
@ Veteran44 I don't ever recall Mrs. Obama saying that she was a very sweet person and loves everyone. You can believe what ever you want because really "Nobody Cares"
What's this Country coming to when "The Great Leader" is doubted? There where dozens of books dumping on Bush, his Wife, his Dog, his State, his Religion, his Father,and his Daughters were Sluts too. It's about time someone did the same to Barack Husein Obama,mmm,mmm,mmm!
He prefers the title of "Dear Leader"
Gosh. Don't you just hate it when someone else decides to characterize your activities? Perhaps folks in the White House ought to call the Bush's............
ROFL, whatever sells, if it sells.
This book sounds like a little bit of facts with a whole bunch of exaggeration and BS.
Im wondering why a correspondent of the NYT would be writing a hit job on the President of the United States. Seems to me, she loses her authority and objectivity no matter how meticulous she may be!
This is certainly one of those things taht make you go HHHHHHMMMMMMMM..............
Hey Jodi, where's that meticulously researched article on how the GOP deliberately created this debt crisis so they could privatize SS and Medicare?? You know.. "starve the beast"!!
Tom those books have been by the thousands for 3 years. They blame all worlds wrongs on Bush. That is the Obama's "M.O." point a finger somewhere else.
She simply wants to make a lot of money. Can't do that if it isn't controversial. Create a stir and you get interviewed on TV, you sell a lot of books.
Lets see if she's doing it at as a personal service to the country that needs to know these things. I challenge her to donate any profits from book sales or appearances to charity. I real journalist doesn't care about getting rich, just getting the facts out.
Listen to her interview on the today show. Who says "According to my reporting"? That's like saying, "I didn't say it was true, but it is what I said." She hadn't had access for over two years and even admits that her book is her interpretation of second hand rumors she heard from other people.
Is there some shred of truth to her book? Maybe, but at best it is hearsay spun into something she can sell. That isn't journalism, that's just blogging on paper for profit.
Imagine! A reporter that is not kissing the Obama,s "you know what"? I guess she missed all the memos.
The President has been skewered to the Nth degree so now they're going after the First Lady. Will exposes on the two children be next?
Jack What planet have you been on? The Obama,s have gotten a free ride with the so called journalists since he started running. That is why he is in the White House. The push for the second term has started havne you read the news.
I like frogs...Is there frogs in this book?
I am a NY Times journalist, I know what your thinking because I have the ability to interpert your slightest gesture, expression and read your mind! Really? Wow, hire that woman.
If your a ny times journalist, then your a paid pig.
I dunno...he sure spells like a journalist.
And.... thinks like one.
While I agree with your sentiments, Michael, I suggest if you say you are a journalist with a well-known paper a spell check might be a good idea:)
Michael is being sarcastic. He is not saying HE is a NY Times journalist.
Takenaka san, are you saying you are a mind reader like Michael ? Or are you saying he's fibbing about his job ? Or did he just forget the sarcasm font ? :) Have you had a chance to read the book yet ?
P.S. None of my comments to you are ever "personal". Ok.
I would give this book 75% truth and 25% not. It's always been puzzling how they have kept Michelle in the WH vegetable garden. She's educated and farming is not her. I believe the WH advisors have kept Michelle in the garden and behind "Obama" ... strong move on their part.
With all due respect, are you a fly in the garden to know the "percentages" of fact or fiction ? The book 100% BS because of the subject matter. :)
a believe or Not believe book..Not wasting my time......
no one should be even mildy surprised that republicans lied again (and again and again). Its how they roll....
Oh please . You meant politicians not just republicans . I cant tell a dem. from a repub. anymore. They all stretch the truth for they`re own agenda. Just like this reporter.
This independent voter will give the president 4 more years to clean up after the 8 years mess Bush left. Is it just me, or does history show that democratic presidents usually clean up after the republicans leave a mess??
Its just you... because history doesn't show that. Who was it that de-regulated Wall Street. I'll make it multiple choice for you.
Ronald Reagan? Nope .. he de-regulated the Savings and Loans and we saw how that worked!
Was it Bush 41? Nope he bailed out the S&Ls.
Was it Bush 43? Nope he bailed out the banks. Warned that Fannie and Freddie should be repealed but the Democrats just laughed.
Was it Bill Clinton? Well he did repeal Glass Stegall which was in place since FDR. He did sign Graham-Leahy act and championed it as a bi-partisan effort (which made CDOs and commodities as unregulated. Of course he also signed NAFTA and gave China MFN status but I am certain those made life better for American workers too.
So whose mess was it?
aaaaaatttttt. Sorry. No points for you and you don't advance to the next round. Thanks for playing but you are not Smarter Than a Fifth Grader.
It's just you, Joe. Why risk your independence by wasting your vote on the janitor, then ? It will be a huge undertakertaking to clean up the mess from this White House posse as it is. Time to bring in a new cleanup crew. Why continue to let it get worse ? ABO 2012 :)
Time to turn on fox news and get brainwashed. Don't study history, it will only confuse you. Fox doesn't pay attention to facts.
It is just you. Anyone with any sense wants him out in the morning, and I seriously doubt that anyone will be able to clean up his mess.
Takenaka's new slogan: "Ban Fox News !" ABO2012.
Nope, you're right. Let the republicans in for awhile, and then we have to hire an adult to clean up after the party. Republicans are like teenagers when the parents aren't home; anything goes, bras end up in the light fixtures, people crap in the sink, vomit in every corner. Then mom and dad clean it all up, cussing the whole time.
As for this book, there is no shortage of bottom feeders waiting to make a fast buck off of tabloid news, as Rupert Murdoch has proven.
I doubt life in the White House is all cheer and happiness, but it isn't around my place either, and we aren't trying to fix 8 years of wonton destruction.
Really? What did Carter clean up? As far as messes left behind, Osama could have been nipped in the bud by more aggressive prosecution by the Clinton administration.
JJ, I said "usually".
As for Carter, he WAS one of our most moral presidents. That should count for something!
And, he's done more for humanity since he's been out of office, than any Xrepublican president I can thing of??
then, after lying, the republicans will lie about lying and eventually blame someone else for their lies.
I`ll bet your so self righteous you have never lied .
Dave...what the hell does your statement mean?
Is Kantor a Republican or a Democrat?
A Kantor sings in a synagogue. Cantor is on the right side of history. :)
Oops. I gave you the wrong answer, sorry. She's a journalist. Her political affiliation is probably dependent on which way the wind is blowing to get her material.
The question is how lavish was the Halloween Event. The President and the First Lady should hold nice events. I just hope Johnny Depp did this without any compensation, and if he did get paid, I hope he donated it to some worthwhile cause.
She'll write in the book anything that it takes to sell it. What other first lady wrote a book. Give me a break.
Mary Jones -
This First Lady did NOT write the book. A reporter did. Give ME a break - perhaps you should read the article before you start indiscriminately bashing the First Lady.
Also, FYI, some First Ladies have written books - at least one of them was named Bush.
Mary Jones- Time to turn on fox. Don't get confused by facts.
hahahahahaha....nice
If you believe this book to be true, then you can only assume that the book about Palin was true, and the Bushies... it works both ways.
Since Mr. Obama won't release much of anything including his touted academic records it's small wonder that much information has to be "second hand".
Rick in the Forest...do you hear any trees falling in that forest you live in? Can you see them?
If you can't...do the still make a sound?
SO, like second hand info is true then?
Duh...
A tree would logically make a sound even if it fell and you didn't see it...Rick!
TRUST ME!!!
The book is not "news." It is the evidence of a snake crawling from behind a bush. The snake is now in plain sight for those that are unbiased enough to see it. Some will think it is just a fancy belt laying upon the ground and will wear it. I do not need to read the book. It is gossip. And, what does our spiritual training tell us about gossip? My life encounters enough negativity without my going out and seeking it for the sake of sensationalism.
is that the George W. Bush??