I THINK THE NATION NEEDS TO KEEP THEIR NOSE OUT OF TIGER'S PERSONAL AFFAIRS; AND THAT GOES FOR MATT AND MEREDITH. LEAVE THE GUY ALONE!!!

Easier said than done, but less heartache in the long run for her & her children. Tiger clearly cannot sustain a monogamous relationship.

Maybe he should check out what she is doing too.

This discussion is pathological. This couple needs help and has asked for privacy. Give it to them. Stop acting like circling vultures.

forgive him for once, but a 3-year relationship with another woman... Oh NO

This is such a private matter, why should we be in the mix at all!!! They have a tough road ahead, God Bless them !!

i am shocked and saddened that the today show would entertain such a poll. The Today Show should be ashamed of themselves.

It depends on if she loves him and what behaviors he is willing to change to save his marriage i.e she gets full access to cell phone/e-mai

If he gives her all passwords, GPS on his car, etc. and call the otehr women to end once and for all, she should try to work it out

NO, but my husband is not a famous athlete worth millions. I'm sure women thow themselves at him all the time, after a while, he got weak.

I am so sick of women who 'stand by their man'. Dump his ass and live your life. Women everywhere will stand up & cheer!

She needs to handle it in the way that is best for her and the children.

Is this really something that is anyone's business other than the people involved?

She should give him 1 chance. If he ever screws up again, she should take all the money and the kids and go back to Sweden

Most of the "I don't know" responders are right. None of us can say either way but for the kids' sake they need to figure it out in private

Money doesn't buy happiness. But if he can change she could give him another chance before leaving. After all they do have children.

Give them a break and leave alone long enought so they can figure it out. She is going thru heck right now and the last thing she needs is

If there's another 55 million coming in two years I think sticking it out until then should be the way she should go...the kids need a dad

If there's a pre-nup she could leave empty handed. She should stay long enough to get as much as she can and then leave.

Take the money and run. Life's too short to live in the spotlight like this

Once a cheater always a cheater. Her sanity and health are at risk with Tiger's reckless behavior.

absolutely not! do not leave...stick with it and make this marriage/family work! too many just jump into the divorce lawyers eager hands .

Mistakes are made by young people who quickly move into fame and fortune. It's worth giving it a chance. You can always leave.

Men want the money for the sex.. women give the sex for the money. taking the money shows it wasn't the love of the marriage just the money

Mothers are judged more harshly in these cases and it isn't fair. These harsh judgments also make an already hard situation even harder

I don't think they are judged harshly this women inthe story chose HERSELF, not in the "best interest of the child".

I think the term "better parent" was misused in this article. I think the child should reside with the parent give them the better life.

bottom line, it isn't anyone else's business WHY a woman chooses to give up custody except hers and the child/children's father.

In the article all I heard the mothers say was "I" first and then what was best for the child.

I feel that it is ok for the mother to give up custodial rights as long as she maintains a relationship with the kids.

The women on the Today Show acted as if her "only" option for a great education was 1 school. Selfish.

If they give up there children because they do not fit in the lifestyle they want shame on them once you have kids it is no longer about u

Inexcusable for a mom to give up her babies. Too bad she was a young mom. Maybe should have thought about that before conception.

Its a sad society everything is mixed up and the kids do suffer, but i would rather they give their kids a chance than get frustrated with

I am a non-custodial mom, my son and I have a great relationship and I am active in his life. His Dad is just able to offer him more.

If you're not ready for kids, don't have sex. All I read was a bunch of excuses. They gave up their kids because they are selfish.

My ex was more able to support the kids, but I was guilted by family into insisting on custody. The kids standard of living suffered.

Why is it always the mother's responsibility. The father decided to have sex too!

The decision is a tough one for either parent. What is best for the children needs to always be thought of first.

Why is it ok for the dad to walk away and moms live such stigma? BOTH parents matter.

Moms are totally judged more harshly. I'm a working mom with an at home dad, and I even judge those moms harshly. it's not fair to them.

Your kids will need therapy for life,so you can go to an expensive school and travel? Society isn't tough enough on you,same goes for men.

We pay women less for the same work as a man and yet we all act surprised when a woman gives up custody for the economic benefit of her kid

Having been 1 that gave her boys ever chance at life, it was a choice I would make the same again.

Due to unbearable trauma and divorce I was mentally unstable to care for my children.

I gave up custody of my son because his father was in the position to raise him in a better lifestyle than I could ever dream of affording.

I joined the Navy when my son was 6, as any man might have. I was treated like a pariah on all sides. We survived it, are all happy today.

yes, as they should be.

He clearly does not want to make things work with his wife which is fine, but he does not have to rub another woman into Kate's face so soo

I don't care that he wants to move on but do it the right way and wait til the divorce is final. For the kids sake.

How can he be so stupid. Take a moment and be with your children. They have to swallow this whole idea first!

He is just a flat out loser. Kate is better off w/out him. Clearly these two were together prior to the divorce.

I have no interest in watching a self-absorbed idiot having a mid-life crisis.

She is just fame seeking, he is clearly going through a mid-life crisis. He made 8 kids, he should raise them, not a 22 year old girlfrien

This just shows what little class the two cheaters have. Talk about selfish! John and his new girlfriend should be ashamed. Kids 1st my but

He should be ashamed. Jon is a person that does not respect his family. Jon is interested in his goals only!

Duh, is this even a serious question? He has 8 kids and is just now seperated..what's the plan to start a family with the whore?

It depends- I don't agree with prenups that have "I can but you can't" or doesn't consider what the other gives up ..career or house/ move

The numbers show why divorce is so common. Prenups seem to just give lawyers more to argue about come splitsville, for a fee.

Been-there advice: Generally, the older you are, the more assets and children you (probably) have. Protect them and yourself, just in case

This needs to be a very personal decision. If one is not in the relationship for the money, then it should be no issue. Sign!

Marriage is a business/emotional entity. Protect past,present and future assets and earnings, investments, retirement and all wealth!

When both of you have children and/or assets, it is imperative to have a pre-nup agreement. On remarrying at 65 and 67. we did.

My husband wanted one before we got married--so I did it. I feel fine about it. It wasn't the end of the world.

yes - if there's a big financial difference or big age difference.

I have considerably more assets than my fiancé does. I own my car, I have no debt, I make more money, and I have over $20k in the bank. H